HyperGraphDB vs TypeDB
Both are other databases. HyperGraphDB (2007, Apache-2.0, Java) ranks #58 this month; TypeDB (2016, MPL-2.0, Rust) ranks #7. They differ on 28 of 46 surveyed features.
| Attribute | HyperGraphDB | TypeDB |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Rank | #58 | #7 |
| Score | 45.4 | 68.4 |
| GitHub stars | 250 | 4.5k |
| Popularity | 41.5 | 75.0 |
| Activity | 32.4 | 75.2 |
| Community | 60.5 | 63.3 |
| Research | 53.7 | 50.0 |
| Fundamentals | ||
| Description | An open-source embedded database for storing hypergraphs, where edges can connect any number of vertices. Uses BerkeleyDB for low-level storage and supports ACID transactions with MVCC conflict detection. | A polymorphic database that natively models inheritance hierarchies, dependencies, and conceptual schemas using its TypeQL query language. Supports clustering for scalability and a cloud-agnostic deployment model. |
| Vendor | — | Vaticle |
| Model | Other | Other |
| Kind | embedded | database |
| Category | Emerging | Growing |
| First released | 2007 | 2016 |
| Status | inactive — Sporadic maintenance only since 2024 | active |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Rust |
| Query languages | Java API | TypeQL |
| gdotv support | no | no |
Feature scores 28 of 46 rows differ
| Feature | HyperGraphDB | TypeDB |
|---|---|---|
| Community & Business | ||
| Active development | 0.5 | ✓ |
| Commercial support | · | ✓ |
| Live community | 0.5 | ✓ |
| Open Source | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing | · | ✓ |
| Trendiness | 0.5 | ✓ |
| Deployment | ||
| Containerization | · | ✓ |
| Work as dedicated instance | ✓ | ✓ |
| Work as embedded | ✓ | · |
| Testing in-memory version | · | ✓ |
| Platform | ||
| Operating on Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating on Windows | 0.5 | ✓ |
| SaaS offering | · | ✓ |
| Operations | ||
| Automatic updates | · | · |
| Client side caching | ✓ | · |
| Data versioning support | ✓ | · |
| Live backups | · | · |
| Distribution | ||
| Cluster Re-balancing | · | · |
| Data Distribution | 0.25 | · |
| High-Availability | · | ✓ |
| Query Distribution | 0.25 | ✓ |
| Replication support | · | ✓ |
| Developer Experience | ||
| Data types defined | ✓ | 0.5 |
| Logging/Auditing | · | ✓ |
| Object-Graph Mapper | ✓ | · |
| Reactive programming | · | ✓ |
| Documentation up-to-date | ✓ | ✓ |
| Binary protocol | ✓ | ✓ |
| CLI | · | ✓ |
| GUI | · | ✓ |
| Data Model | ||
| Multi-database | ✓ | · |
| Graph-native data | · | · |
| REST API | · | · |
| Query Language | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Transactions | ||
| Granular locking | · | · |
| Multiple isolation levels | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Read committed transaction | 0.25 | ✓ |
| Transaction support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Schema & Security | ||
| Constraints | ✓ | ✓ |
| Schema support | 0.5 | ✓ |
| Secondary indexes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Server side procedures | · | · |
| Triggers | 0.5 | ✓ |
| Authentication | · | ✓ |
| Authorization | · | ✓ |
| Data encryption | · | · |
Links
- HyperGraphDB · website · github · full profile
- TypeDB · website · github · full profile