TigerGraph vs Virtuoso
TigerGraph is a property graph database; Virtuoso is a multiple database. TigerGraph (2017-09, Proprietary, C++) ranks #19 this month; Virtuoso (1998, GPL-2.0, C) ranks #43. They differ on 22 of 46 surveyed features.
| Attribute | TigerGraph | Virtuoso |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Rank | #19 | #43 |
| Score | 57.0 | 49.1 |
| GitHub stars | — | 976 |
| Popularity | 48.9 | 62.4 |
| Activity | 58.4 | 44.4 |
| Community | 62.4 | 36.0 |
| Research | 61.7 | 53.6 |
| Fundamentals | ||
| Description | A distributed property graph database (formerly GraphSQL) built for massively parallel processing and graph analytics. Uses the SQL-like GSQL query language and supports ACID transactions. Available in developer, cloud, and enterprise editions. | A multi-model database supporting relational, RDF, and property graph data. Supports horizontal scaling, SPARQL and SQL queries. Available in open-source and proprietary enterprise editions. |
| Vendor | TigerGraph | OpenLink Software |
| Model | Property Graph | Multiple |
| Kind | database | database |
| Category | Established | Enterprise |
| First released | 2017-09 | 1998 |
| Status | active | active |
| License | Proprietary | GPL-2.0 |
| Written in | C++ | C |
| Query languages | GSQL | SQL, SPARQL |
| gdotv support | no | yes |
Feature scores 22 of 46 rows differ
| Feature | TigerGraph | Virtuoso |
|---|---|---|
| Community & Business | ||
| Active development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Commercial support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Live community | 0.5 | ✓ |
| Open Source | · | ✓ |
| Pricing | · | ✓ |
| Trendiness | 0.5 | · |
| Deployment | ||
| Containerization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Work as dedicated instance | ✓ | ✓ |
| Work as embedded | ✓ | · |
| Testing in-memory version | 0.5 | · |
| Platform | ||
| Operating on Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| Operating on Windows | 0.5 | ✓ |
| SaaS offering | · | ✓ |
| Operations | ||
| Automatic updates | · | · |
| Client side caching | · | · |
| Data versioning support | · | · |
| Live backups | ✓ | ✓ |
| Distribution | ||
| Cluster Re-balancing | · | · |
| Data Distribution | ✓ | ✓ |
| High-Availability | ✓ | · |
| Query Distribution | ✓ | ✓ |
| Replication support | 0.5 | ✓ |
| Developer Experience | ||
| Data types defined | ✓ | · |
| Logging/Auditing | 0.5 | ✓ |
| Object-Graph Mapper | · | · |
| Reactive programming | · | · |
| Documentation up-to-date | 0.75 | 0.5 |
| Binary protocol | · | · |
| CLI | ✓ | ✓ |
| GUI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data Model | ||
| Multi-database | ✓ | ✓ |
| Graph-native data | ✓ | · |
| REST API | ✓ | ✓ |
| Query Language | ✓ | ✓ |
| Transactions | ||
| Granular locking | · | ✓ |
| Multiple isolation levels | · | ✓ |
| Read committed transaction | 0.5 | ✓ |
| Transaction support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Schema & Security | ||
| Constraints | · | ✓ |
| Schema support | ✓ | · |
| Secondary indexes | · | ✓ |
| Server side procedures | ✓ | ✓ |
| Triggers | · | ✓ |
| Authentication | ✓ | ✓ |
| Authorization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data encryption | ✓ | · |
Links
- TigerGraph · website · full profile
- Virtuoso · website · github · full profile